top of page

Intermediate Tests
 
Intermediate tests are suitable for mid-level professionals, typically specialised positions that require previous experience. Examples include marketing, sales, human resources and managers of frontline or administrative teams.
 
The following suite of testing is recommended;

 

  • Verbal reasoning (written and oral) tests a persons ability using typical business information which may have technical or specialised detail that must be interpreted accurately and often relates to a function or a role.

  • Numerical reasoning tests a persons ability to work with numerical information including calculations, statistics, graphical data and business reporting. Intermediate testing at this level requires sound knowledge and experience with addition, subtraction, division, percentages and fractions.

  • Inductive reasoning (optional – depending on the challenging nature of the role). Inductive reasoning tests a persons ability to problem solve and think on their feet.  In short, this test evaluates a persons ability to comprehend and make sense of information they are unfamiliar with, which therefore relies on their intellect rather than prior knowledge.

  • Personality testing Intermediate level roles are pivotal in organisations as they have a significant impact on the contribution they make to the business and team. Their team fit and broader cultural fit when working with stakeholders across the organisation also requires high levels of collaboration, influence and diplomacy.​

All you need to do is fill out the following and we will send you your test link...

​

Which tests would you like?

Would you like your intermediate tests sent to you now?

Intermediate Verbal Reasoning Test

​

Intermediate verbal reasoning assessments (written and oral) are a type of cognitive test designed to evaluate an

individual's ability to understand and draw a detailed understanding of technical, role specific and often complicated

information or instructions.

 

​

Verbal reasoning skills are crucial for comprehending information, making it an essential test for most mid-level, technical and supervisory positions. This suite of testing typically involves tasks that require detailed and technical interpretation and or editing and reporting of information.

​

Some common components of an intermediate verbal reasoning tests include:

Reading Comprehension test: This involves reading detailed passages of text and answering questions about the content, main ideas, specific references, and implications presented in the passage. This style of test assesses your ability to understand written information and extract relevant information.

This test has

20 questions and will take

25 minutes

Example Test Question 1

To operate a fire extinguisher in line with the 2005 Act, a competent person is deemed to have received prior training and experience with fire extinguishers.

​

​

​

​

​

In this question, the correct answer is 'True'.  

Explanation: A competent person should demonstrate knowledge of current best practice in the sector and be prepared to supplement gaps in training.

True

False

This information is not provided

Sample Test Questions

​

Read the following passage:

Section 8 of the 2005 Act also requires employers to obtain, where necessary, the services of a competent person. A definition of competent person is in Section 2(2) of the 2005 Act. – a competent person should possess sufficient training, experience and knowledge having regard to the task and the size or hazards (or both) of the undertaking. Suitability must be assessed in the light of the specific intended functions. The competent person should demonstrate knowledge of current best practice in the sector and be prepared to supplement gaps in training.

​

Example Test Question 2

The two main criteria expected of a “competent person” are to demonstrate knowledge of current best practice in the sector and be prepared to supplement gaps in training.

​

​

​

​

​

In this question, the correct answer is 'True'.  

Explanation: A competent person should demonstrate knowledge of current best practice in the sector and be prepared to supplement gaps in training.

True

False

This information is not provided

Want more?
Try the testing yourself in this short demonstration.

Intermediate Numerical Reasoning Test

​

Numerical reasoning tests a person's ability to work with numerical information including calculations, statistics,

graphical data and business reporting. Intermediate testing at this level requires sound knowledge and experience

with addition, subtraction, division, percentages and fractions. This level of test often requires a person to review,

understand and calculate a specific response which would be considered complicated or involve multiple steps

(similar to the requirements of the role this test evaluates).

​

Purpose: Intermediate level numerical reasoning tests are assessments designed to evaluate an individual's ability to competently understand operational, technical and leadership information. They are likely to be highly specific in nature and require activities which may require experience or training to undertake.

 

These tests are commonly used for a variety of team leader, frontline manager, mid-level technical roles and positions with 5-10 years of experience. Typical roles include accounts assistant, call centre team manager, nurses, sales representatives, marketing specialists and engineering support roles. Intermediate tests are the default option for positions that are neither administrative or senior leadership.

 

The primary purpose of these tests is to assess a candidate's proficiency in handling rudimentary numerical data, performing basic mathematical calculations, and making informed decisions based on numerical information.

 

Content: Intermediate numerical reasoning tests typically cover detailed and often complex mathematical concepts such as percentages, fractions, algebra, multiple calculation scenario’s, statistics, trend analysis, identifying numerical patterns and working with ambiguous numerical data that may be derived from multiple sources.

This test has

20 questions and will take

25 minutes

Sample Test Questions

The below customer satisfaction survey highlights the performance of 2 different stores (same brand).

Example Test Question 1

Which survey category receives the "lowest" feedback for both stores (i.e. the total of Store 1 and Store 2)?

​

​

​

​

​

 

 

 

​

In this example, Free delivery provides the lowest total feedback for Store 1 and Store 2, therefore the correct answer is 
c) Free 
delivery.  

Calculation: 53% + 41% = 94%

a) Ease of returning goods

b) Ease of creating an online account

c) Free delivery

d) Variety of products

e) Fair and easy to understand returns policy

Example Test Question 2

Which survey category receives the "highest" feedback for both stores (i.e. the total of Store 1 and Store 2)?

​

​

​

​

​

 

 

 

 

In this example, Variety of products provides the highest total feedback for Store 1 and Store 2, therefore the correct answer is
d) Variety of products.  

Calculation: 71% + 84% = 115%

a) Ease of returning unwanted goods

b) Ease of creating an online account

c) Free delivery

d) Variety of products

e) Fair and easy to understand returns policy

Want more?
Try the testing yourself in this short demonstration.

Intermediate Inductive Reasoning Test

​

Inductive reasoning tests a persons' ability to form generalisations or hypotheses based on specific observations or

evidence. In a work environment, inductive reasoning relates to how quickly a person can learn, interpret new

information or scenarios they are unfamiliar with.

​

Inductive reasoning tests are typically reserved for highly technical positions, senior leadership roles and graduates.

Examples include: Qualified accountant, head of marketing, national sales manager, engineers, genealogists, lawyers and all graduate positions.

​

Example of inductive reasoning:

Observation: You have seen ten cats, and all of them have been black. Inductive conclusion: You might make the generalisation that all cats are black.

​

It's important to note that inductive reasoning doesn't guarantee the truth of the conclusion but rather makes the conclusion probable or likely based on the evidence. As such, inductive conclusions are considered strong or weak, depending on the quality and quantity of the evidence.

 

Example of deductive reasoning: Premise 1: All humans are mortal. Premise 2: John is a human. Conclusion: Therefore, John is mortal.

​

Summary:

Inductive reasoning moves from specific observations to general conclusions and is probabilistic in nature.

This test has

22 questions and will take

25 minutes

Example Test Question 1

This assessment requires you to match the patterns in the Extract with Group A, Group B, or identify that Neither match.

In the example, Group B matches the Extract. 

They both have 4 objects, whereas Group A only has 3 objects.
Therefore, answer b) Group B is the correct answer.

GROUP A

Group A

Group B

Neither

GROUP B

EXTRACT

Test image 3 circles
Test image 4 circles
Test image 4 circles with cross

Example Test Question 2

This assessment requires you to match the patterns in the Extract with Group A, Group B, or identify that Neither match.

In this example, Neither Group A or Group B match the Extract. The Extract only has 2 objects, where as Group A has 3 objects, Group B has 4. Therefore, answer c) Neither is the correct answer.

GROUP A

Group A

Group B

Neither

GROUP B

EXTRACT

Test image 3 circles
Test image 4 circles
Test image circle and square

Want more?
Try the testing yourself in this short demonstration.

Intermediate Personality Test

​

Psychometric behavioral profiling involves the use of psychological questions which are used to analyse and

generate patterns of human behavior which indicate consistent preferences or themes of dislike. Behavioural

profiling leverages a broad range of standardized tests and questionnaires to provide valuable insights into an

individual's psychological makeup. Their purpose is typically to enable organisations and professionals to make

informed, unbiased decisions.

 

Intermediate level positions require individuals to lead a pivotal role in managing the day-to-day operations of an organisation, providing guidance to their teams and supporting senior leadership and technical functions to deliver. Therefore, several key personality traits are highly valuable for success in Intermediate roles. They also vary depending on the specific nature of the role (i.e. an assistant accountant will require a highly effective attention to detail).

​

Organizational Skills: Intermediate professionals are responsible for overseeing and managing teams to contribute effectively. They need to manage their time effectively, plan, pre-empt and use their initiative to guide others, or more formally lead their own team.

​

Attention to Detail: Intermediate level responsibility often involves overseeing, appraising and identifying the accuracy of information before proving their approval. Having an eye for detail is crucial to avoid errors and ensure accuracy in tasks such as reporting, interpreting instructions and communications.

​

Dependability: Intermediate professionals are responsible for their role and often the performance of their team and function. Being dependable means showing up on time, consistently delivering deadlines, and being reliable in handling responsibilities.

​

Adaptability: Intermediate professionals are dynamic, requiring them to multi-tasks and re-prioritise many times through the day. Being adaptable and actively supporting change enables both themselves and their team to handle unexpected challenges and shifting workloads effectively.

​

Problem-Solving Skills: Intermediate professionals are likely to continually deal with obstacles, challenges, unfamiliar situations and ambiguity that require creative problem-solving. The ability to think critically and find solutions to issues as they arise is highly valuable.

​

Time Management: Intermediate professionals must juggle multiple tasks and responsibilities. Effective time management skills help them allocate their time wisely, enabling both themselves and their team to prioritise tasks, and meet deadlines.

​

Confidentiality: Intermediate professionals often work with operationally sensitive information or personal details relating to their team. It's crucial for them to maintain the confidentiality and privacy of such data. Trustworthiness is a key trait in this regard.

​

Proactive Attitude: Taking initiative to identify and address issues or inefficiencies are core skills for an Intermediate professional. Their roles consistently require them to proactively manage tasks, supporting their team and senior leaders effectively. They may also be involved in leading process improvements and seeking opportunities to increase productivity.

​

Team Player: Intermediate professionals are influential team members, either guiding and supporting others, or more formally managing a team. Role modelling team behaviour, cooperating with others, and proactively supporting others to contribute to a harmonious work environment is a pivotal aspect of their role.

​

Stress Management: Intermediate professional roles are typically demanding, with tight deadlines and high-pressure situations. The ability to manage stress and remain composed is essential for maintaining team productivity and well-being.

​

Tech Savviness: In the modern workplace, familiarity with office software and digital tools is crucial. Intermediate professionals should be comfortable using most aspects of Microsoft Office as well as technical software and programs, or at the very least understand their general function.

​

Ethical Conduct: Upholding a strong sense of ethics and integrity is essential for Intermediate professionals, as they continually handle confidential information and make decisions that impact their team and the organisation's reputation.

This test has

45 questions and will take

15 minutes

Sample Test Question 1
Select the description which is most like you.

​

"I don't often do more
than is expected of me"

1

(Least Like Me)

6

(Most Like Me)

Sample Test Question 1
Select the description which is most like you.

​

"I don't often double
check my work"

1

(Least Like Me)

6

(Most Like Me)

Sample Test Question 1
Select the description which is most like you.

​

"I go out of my way
to help others"

1

(Least Like Me)

6

(Most Like Me)

Want more?
Try the testing yourself in this short demonstration.

bottom of page